Zapier vs Make vs n8n for Automation
1. Pricing — How Costs Scale with Usage
Zapier
-
Tiered plans with task limits; most plans include multi-step workflows and premium apps.
-
Free: 100 tasks/month
-
Starter/Pro: from ~$19.99/month (750-2,000 tasks)
-
Team/Enterprise: custom with high task quotas and governance.
-
-
Billing model: Per task — every action counts toward usage. Costs escalate quickly if you run many tasks or multi-step workflows.
-
Best when you want predictable SaaS billing and don’t mind paying premium for ease of use.
Make (formerly Integromat)
-
Plans generally cheaper than Zapier at comparable entry tiers.
-
Free: 1,000 operations/month
-
Paid: from ~$9–$29+/month for 10,000+ operations
-
Enterprise: custom pricing with large operation counts.
-
-
Billing model: Per operation (each node/module in a scenario). More generous than Zapier but can still add up with branching/loops.
-
Often seen as a middle ground — strong visual builder at lower cost per credit.
n8n
-
Two main deployment choices:
-
Self-hosted: open-source, free software (you pay infrastructure costs).
-
Cloud hosted: ~$20–$50+/month with execution limits; enterprise options are custom.
-
-
Billing model: Per workflow execution (not per step), which can be much cheaper for complex automations.
-
Often the lowest total cost for high-volume or complex workflows — especially self-hosted.
Summary:
| Platform | Pricing Model | Typical Cost Profile |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Per task | Highest cost at scale |
| Make | Per operation | Mid-range, better than Zapier |
| n8n | Per execution / self-hosted free | Lowest long-term cost |
2. Scalability — Handling Growth & Volume
Zapier
-
Easy cloud scaling with higher plans, but cost grows with task volume.
-
Enterprise adds governance, security, and support at higher cost.
Make
-
Fully managed cloud, scales with usage.
-
Good for large teams with many scenarios; operations add up with volume and complexity.
n8n
-
Self-hosted option lets you scale with your infrastructure (virtually unlimited).
-
Managed cloud also scales but with set execution tiers.
-
Requires technical ops maturity (deployment, monitoring, backups).
Practical Takeaways:
-
Best for simple scale: Zapier (managed SaaS).
-
Best for complex/many workflows: Make (cloud, cost-effective).
-
Best for high execution volume at low cost: n8n self-hosted — but you own the infrastructure.
3. Enterprise Usage — Security, Governance & Team Features
Zapier
-
Strong team features at higher plans: SSO, role-based access, shared workspaces, advanced controls.
-
Enterprise support, compliance, and analytics.
Make
-
Offers collaboration and team features in paid tiers; cloud handles infrastructure.
-
Security and governance are traditional SaaS — less mature than Zapier at enterprise scale.
n8n
-
Self-hosted gives maximum data control and compliance if you configure it properly.
-
Cloud enterprise adds RBAC and managed support.
-
Enterprise use often requires internal engineering support for CI/CD, uptime SLAs and security hardening.
Enterprise Fit Summary:
-
Strongest turnkey enterprise tool: Zapier (security + governance out of box).
-
Balanced enterprise with technical teams: Make.
-
Most flexible but requires ops investment: n8n (especially self-hosted).
4. Automation Complexity — What Can You Build
Zapier
-
Excellent ease of use, low-code editor, clear interface.
-
Good for simple to moderately complex logic with branching and filters.
-
Very large integration ecosystem (thousands of apps).
Make
-
Strong visual design for branching, loops, data parsing.
-
Better at complex data transformation than Zapier.
n8n
-
Most flexible for developers and technical automations.
-
Custom code (JavaScript) and API requests make it powerful.
-
Steeper learning curve than the others.
Complexity Fit Summary:
-
Least technical: Zapier.
-
Mid-range with powerful logic: Make.
-
Most capable for developers & custom APIs: n8n.
Recommendation Matrix
| Team Size / Budget | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Solo / Freelancers | Zapier or n8n Cloud | Easy to start; Zapier for UX, n8n Cloud for low-cost executions |
| Small Team / Limited Budget | Make | Affordable operation tiers and good complexity handling |
| Mid-Size Team / Growing Workloads | Make or n8n | Make for managed scaling; n8n if you have tech support |
| Large Enterprise with Governance Needs | Zapier Enterprise | Strong admin controls, SLAs, security features |
| High-Volume Complex Automation | n8n self-hosted | Lowest cost per execution; full flexibility |
| Strict Data Control / Compliance | n8n self-hosted | Data stays on your servers |
Quick Buyer Tips
-
Don’t just compare sticker price. Billing models (task vs. operation vs. execution) radically change total cost.
-
Consider team skills. n8n excels if you have developers; Zapier excels if you don’t.
-
Evaluate long-term growth. What seems cheap with 1–2 workflows can get pricey fast on Zapier.
-
Enterprise needs governance early. Zapier’s built-in security and admin controls save time compared to DIY.